Treasonous Traitors and Organized Crime

Divulged this week—

  • A US spy who had cultivated a ten-year relationship with Putin was extracted from Russia soon after Traitor-45 divulged confidential information, to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, during a meeting in the Oval Office. The spy was removed because the Orange Menace couldn’t be trusted. That news, as well as the spy’s current location, were leaked to mainstream media this week, putting the person’s life at risk.
  • Doesn’t this make Putin’s POTUS guilty of espionage?
  • The Espionage Act— “Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used … to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates or attempts to communicate to any foreign government…”

    • There is a whistleblower among the intelligence community with compelling information about the toupeed tyrant. House Intel Committee Chaiman Adam Schiff, who announced this to the public in an effort to protect the whistleblower, says the Director of National Intelligence is withholding information that was deemed urgent. The inspector General agrees that this information is urgent, but Don the Con’s fixer, Attorney General Bill Barr continues to protect he who isn’t his client, from any adverse testimony, any investigations or inquiries, to the point of putting our national security at risk. Additionally, the Department of Justice, headed by Barr, continues to block the House Judiciary Committee from seeing Grand Jury material from the Mueller probe.

    Doesn’t this make Barr, by definition, a traitor?

    Traitors— “betray the trust of those who have faith in them or believe their promises. Traitor also applies to a person who betrays his country by committing treason: turning against his own government, perhaps by selling secret information.

    If Lumpy 45 is innocent, why does the DOJ persist with attempts to keep evidence hidden?

    Why silence a whistleblower who is offering information that is pertinent to congress, for the protection of our national security? Why is a lifelong criminal who stole the office of president with the help of a hostile foreign government, a dictator, more important that preserving our freedom from tyranny?

    Aren’t those governing us, by definition, taking part in organized crime?

    Organized crime— “is a category of transnational, national, or local groupings of highly centralized enterprises run by criminals who intend to engage in illegal activity, most commonly for profit. Some criminal organizations, such as terrorist groups, are politically motivated.

    Contrary to appearances, I believe we in the US are concerned with current events, but we are numb because of the persistent, slow drip of shocking crimes this man has committed. This isn’t normal, and we need to feel the urgency of the situation we are in.

    The DOJ claims we can’t indict a sitting president. But, the DOJ won’t allow Congress to see grand jury evidence that they need for their impeachment investigation.

    Let’s review: In the world according to Barr, no one is allowed to indict a sitting president, nor is evidence to be turned over to Congress, which would allow them to move forward with impeachment. Barr is interfering with the work of Congress. In Barr’s world this squatter-in-chief is untouchable. It makes me wonder if Barr would protect him if he refused to step down when the time comes.

    Meanwhile we have that guy who won’t allow any election security bills to pass— what’s his name… Moscow Mitch McConnell, the GOP senate majority leader from Kentucky, whose tax cut for the wealthiest 1% has added $1 trillion to the national deficit. Since then, Mitch has repeatedly threatened to take Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, because he says these programs caused the national deficit escalation. That is a lie. These programs are fully funded, by us. Anyway,

    • This week we learned Mitch blocked a bill in January to fund Kentucky coal miners’ pension and healthcare funds. He gave that $4 million to the company belonging to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, the company McConnell is profiting from, the company that announced it would open a plant in Kentucky, McConnell’s state, after he ended Deripaska’s sanctions.
  • Isn’t Moscow Mitch, by definition, guilty of treason?

    Treason— ”Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

    I keep hearing there is reason to hope, so I keep hoping.

    Schiff accuses top intel official of illegally withholding ‘urgent’ whistleblower complaint

    DOJ argues House lawmakers should not gain access to Mueller grand jury materials

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.